Bridging Theory and Practice Since 1974

Category: Landscape Architecture (Page 1 of 2)

Undergrads analyze UNC spaces

This post was originally published on February 28, 2018. As the end of summer approaches and the school year starts, we go back to one of the archives to take a look at the spaces at UNC.

By Marques Wilson, Forest Schweitzer, Olivia Corriere, Bronwyn Bishop, and Joe Young

As part of the Community Design and Green Architecture (ENEC 420) course with Eric Thomas, the Project Manager and Lead Designer at Development Finance Initiative, undergraduate UNC students evaluated public space. Using video and behavior mapping techniques, students evaluated how different local spaces are used, or not, at different times of the day and on different days. They noted weather and other factors that would influence the behavior of people in the space, and produced final reports and videos to highlight the design features that seem successful in attracting and keeping people, and those that fall short. See excerpts from two groups’ final reports and their videos below:

The Pit: 

 

“There is nothing elegant, advanced or expertly designed about The Pit at UNC and yet it is a focal point of our campus. It is quite literally a glorified rectangle-shaped hole in the ground. It’s only definitive feature being steps lining the edge and two large trees in it’s center. How does something so simple have such an impact on the everyday lives of students? The Pit’s simplistic nature lends itself to ease of use, but it is largely so successful because of its central location. The Pit is surrounded by some of the most frequently visited buildings on campus: the student union, the Student Store, the dining hall, Lenoir, The Undergraduate Library, and Davis Library. These buildings attract students of all years and majors.

The Pit is used in many ways and is a healthy, bustling part of UNC’s campus. However, it could stand to be improved. For example, the entire unused section nearest to the Undergraduate Library could be revitalized using creative seating solutions. We propose a designed space — different than anything The Pit has seen before — of modern multi-use benches in what is now “dead space.” An example of our vision is the Plaza at Harvard and the simplistic, yet artistic benches that exist there. Our hope is that this will give new life to this area of The Pit because when people see intentional seating for them in a popular social place, they will utilize it. Also, the modern design of the benches will give The Pit and exciting element of relevance in design that college students are likely to be interested in.”

Sculpture Garden:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d0wshgas3Ak&t=5s

“We chose to analyze the Sculpture Garden, which lays between Kenan College of Music, the Hanes Art Center, and Swain Hall.  The space is primarily transitional, with bits of student-made art sprinkled throughout.  A diagonal, bricked walkway extends through a grass matrix, forming a square with three sides touching the above buildings. The Sculpture Garden is a moderate-to-heavily used space.  The primary form of traffic is individuals walking in either direction along the prescribed brick pathway.  Although there were bikes present in the data, the absence of bike infrastructure, and the sometimes clogged nature of the pathway deterred most from riding their bikes through the Garden.  One might think that the grass matrix would be attractive sprawling space for individuals and groups looking to eddy out of the central flow, or to simply mill about and consume the art present, but this data was absent from the study.  Some few individuals crossed ‘unconventionally’ across the grass, but these were in the extreme minority.  The particularity of the pathway (leading to the front doors of Hanes Art) does not lead for much variation, and thus only suits a specific type of traveler: they who wish to walk from Swain Hall, or other locals in mid campus, to Hanes Art or over to South Columbia Street.

Our recommendations would be to make the space feel like it belongs in the arts part of campus.  Make it different.  Make it new.  The single brick path should either be removed or downplayed.  A program should be put in place informing passers-by that they are free to walk in the way most organic to them, for perhaps a year.  At the end of this period, the paths naturally worn into the grass matrix could be either bricked over or simply defined and formalized.  More sculptures and places for people to sit should be installed.  The sculptures fortify the space; they make a large, empty space feel small and intimate.  They afford privacy without actually cutting the individual off from the rest of the Garden.  Even non-three dimensional additions like posters and murals on the sides of Kenan and Hanes would really bring the place alive.  There is ample real estate with which to flesh out not only the Sculpture Garden, but to crystalize what it means to be an artist at Carolina.  In doing so the university could strengthen its image, and foster a robust space for artists on campus to share their own work and consume and comment on the work of their peers and mentors.”

Analysis of the Sculpture Garden by Marques Wilson (Undergraduate Senior, Public Relations B.A., Sustainability Minor), Forest Schweitzer (Undergraduate Junior, Environmental Studies B.A. – Sustainability Track), and Olivia Corriere (Undergraduate Sophomore, Environmental Studies B.A. – Sustainability Track, Geography Minor).

Analysis of the Pit by Bronwyn Bishop (Undergraduate Senior, Environmental Studies B.A. – Sustainability Track, Writing for the Screen and Stage Minor) and Joe Young (Senior, Environmental Science B.S., Mathematics Minor).

Featured Image: The Pit at UNC Chapel Hill. Photo Credit: UNC Admissions

DCRP in the Urban Land Institute Hines Student Competition

Each year, the Urban Land Institute conducts the annual Hines Student Competition — an opportunity for graduate students students across the country to form teams and create a visionary land use development design for a site in a North American city.  Each team of five must have members representing at least three different disciplines. Teams have two weeks to produce graphics and written analysis supporting their design and market decisions. The most recent competition in January focused on a site in Toronto, Canada.  

Colleen Durfee and Sarah Parkins, both second-year DCRP Masters students and participants in this year’s competition, agreed to share some of their experiences and observations from the event.  

 

What schools and disciplines were represented on your team?

Colleen: My team included students from DCRP and NC State.

Sarah: We had two students from UNC DCRP representing concentrations in housing and community development and economic development; one student getting her Masters in landscape architecture from State; and one student getting her Masters in Architecture at State. One of the best things about our team was that it an all-female team.

 

What were the main objectives of your team’s proposal?

Colleen: Develop the area as a connector/bridge between the downtown to the East and inner ring residential to the North and West. Provide services and amenities to the local community that can add value to the space we were developing. Bring in film industry professionals and educational institutions to learn from each other and grow from cluster development. Provide additional residential space.

Sarah: Our proposal titled TOD+ worked to deliver a mixed-use development centered around people in transition. Sited at the nexus of several new districts, it does not compete with their distinct identities, but rather facilitates the growth of people who live or work in the surrounding neighborhoods or are simply passing through.

As a gateway city that embraces cultural diversity and is expecting a significant increase in immigration, Toronto will need to facilitate the smooth transition of its diverse newcomers. TOD+ supports this notion by offering a range of affordable housing options and institutional support services that cater to immigrants resettling in Toronto.

As the supply of rental housing continues to be outpaced by demand, TOD+ also focuses on providing affordable housing options to aging millennials, encouraging them to remain in the urban core as they transition through different life stages. The largest component of TOD+ is multi-generational housing that embodies 8 to 80 principles.

In support of Toronto’s identity as a prominent hub of tourism and commerce, TOD+ further establishes a seamless experience for Toronto’s many short-term visitors who are temporarily settling in the city for business or pleasure. TOD+ offers both traditional and experimental hotel options that serve business professionals visiting nearby East Harbour and provides an immersive cultural experience to curious adventurers eager to explore downtown or the outlying neighborhoods.

To accomplish these goals, TOD+ reclaims the lost space of this flood-prone site by creating an elevated platform that spans from the western side of Broadview Avenue to the Don River.

FinalBoard_team188987

TOD+ team design.  Photo Credit: Sarah Parkins

Describe some of the opportunities and limitations of working with the Toronto site.

Colleen: We experienced limits to the kind and amount of data we needed. Additionally, we were not familiar with how public/municipal financing works in Canada or where to find needed data and information.

Sarah: This was the first year that the ULI Hines competition took place outside of the US, which caused a lot of limitations. Our training about zoning, planning tools, financing modeling and sources, and building codes have taken place within the context of the US, so we had to go through a crash course on the political, social, economic, and financial environment of Toronto in about a week. However, the great part of this competition is that no idea can be too big.  So while we were trying to consider those world real factors, we also got to make some pretty big design decisions, like capping the highway and building a huge underground park that takes on water during floods; something you probably couldn’t normally propose for a development.

 

How did your training at DCRP and your experience as a planner inform your team’s design?

Colleen: I knew somewhat where to find the data I needed but it was still difficult, and I felt like I had to make some pretty huge assumptions I was not terribly comfortable with.

Sarah: My role was really unique in terms of coming on as a DCRP student because I also have a degree in architecture from my undergrad, so my experience as team leader was really as a bridge between the designers and the planners. I was able to look at the project from both of these sides, consider the economic strategies that would work best for us, and deal with issues about land acquisition and programming a mixed-use development while also helping to envision what our site would physically look like through design. I honestly can say that I used a little bit of everything I’ve learned from DCRP during this competition, including topics from my affordable housing classes to transportation classes.

What was your greatest learning experience from the process?

Colleen: I learned how to do a pro forma, and I learned a lot about the design process, about how it is iterative, and how when it is compressed, you don’t have the time you need to marinate with an idea. Rushing through it does not necessarily bring about the most creative results for groups, and I think that is part of why they compress the competition timeline. I think we would have benefited from being able to think through things without the stress of the limited time, but overall I loved working with landscape architects and seeing our ideas visually.

Sarah: Personally, this opportunity was a great way to combine all my skills from a degree in architecture with the skills from my master’s degree. I got to practice the skills needed to think through an urban redevelopment strategy, considering the financial analysis while also including programming and placemaking concepts. But I also got to make renderings and drawings that represented the design of the project.

It was also great to practice how to communicate between different disciplines. There were definitely barriers between our planners and our designers, so it was challenging trying to bridge that gap and have everyone on the team learn from each other’s disciplines.

This was a great opportunity and I really recommend it to any students who are interested in real estate development or urban design. It was a lot of work, but it was absolutely worth it.

 

Visit the ULI website for more information on the Hines Student Competition.

Featured Image: View of the main competition site in Toronto.  Photo Credit: Urban Land Institute

 

 

Undergrads analyze UNC spaces

As part of the Community Design and Green Architecture (ENEC 420) course with Eric Thomas, the Project Manager and Lead Designer at Development Finance Initiative, undergraduate UNC students evaluated public space. Using video and behavior mapping techniques, students evaluated how different local spaces are used, or not, at different times of the day and on different days. They noted weather and other factors that would influence the behavior of people in the space, and produced final reports and videos to highlight the design features that seem successful in attracting and keeping people, and those that fall short. See excerpts from two groups’ final reports and their videos below.

The Pit: 

“There is nothing elegant, advanced or expertly designed about The Pit at UNC and yet it is a focal point of our campus. It is quite literally a glorified rectangle-shaped hole in the ground. It’s only definitive feature being steps lining the edge and two large trees in it’s center. How does something so simple have such an impact on the everyday lives of students? The Pit’s simplistic nature lends itself to ease of use, but it is largely so successful because of its central location. The Pit is surrounded by some of the most frequently visited buildings on campus: the student union, the Student Store, the dining hall, Lenoir, The Undergraduate Library, and Davis Library. These buildings attract students of all years and majors.

The Pit is used in many ways and is a healthy, bustling part of UNC’s campus. However, it could stand to be improved. For example, the entire unused section nearest to the Undergraduate Library could be revitalized using creative seating solutions. We propose a designed space — different than anything The Pit has seen before — of modern multi-use benches in what is now “dead space.” An example of our vision is the Plaza at Harvard and the simplistic, yet artistic benches that exist there. Our hope is that this will give new life to this area of The Pit because when people see intentional seating for them in a popular social place, they will utilize it. Also, the modern design of the benches will give The Pit and exciting element of relevance in design that college students are likely to be interested in.”

Sculpture Garden:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d0wshgas3Ak&t=5s

“We chose to analyze the Sculpture Garden, which lays between Kenan College of Music, the Hanes Art Center, and Swain Hall.  The space is primarily transitional, with bits of student-made art sprinkled throughout.  A diagonal, bricked walkway extends through a grass matrix, forming a square with three sides touching the above buildings. The Sculpture Garden is a moderate-to-heavily used space.  The primary form of traffic is individuals walking in either direction along the prescribed brick pathway.  Although there were bikes present in the data, the absence of bike infrastructure, and the sometimes clogged nature of the pathway deterred most from riding their bikes through the Garden.  One might think that the grass matrix would be attractive sprawling space for individuals and groups looking to eddy out of the central flow, or to simply mill about and consume the art present, but this data was absent from the study.  Some few individuals crossed ‘unconventionally’ across the grass, but these were in the extreme minority.  The particularity of the pathway (leading to the front doors of Hanes Art) does not lead for much variation, and thus only suits a specific type of traveler: they who wish to walk from Swain Hall, or other locals in mid campus, to Hanes Art or over to South Columbia Street.

Our recommendations would be to make the space feel like it belongs in the arts part of campus.  Make it different.  Make it new.  The single brick path should either be removed or downplayed.  A program should be put in place informing passers-by that they are free to walk in the way most organic to them, for perhaps a year.  At the end of this period, the paths naturally worn into the grass matrix could be either bricked over or simply defined and formalized.  More sculptures and places for people to sit should be installed.  The sculptures fortify the space; they make a large, empty space feel small and intimate.  They afford privacy without actually cutting the individual off from the rest of the Garden.  Even non-three dimensional additions like posters and murals on the sides of Kenan and Hanes would really bring the place alive.  There is ample real estate with which to flesh out not only the Sculpture Garden, but to crystalize what it means to be an artist at Carolina.  In doing so the university could strengthen its image, and foster a robust space for artists on campus to share their own work and consume and comment on the work of their peers and mentors.”

 

Analysis of the Sculpture Garden by Marques Wilson (Undergraduate Senior, Public Relations B.A., Sustainability Minor), Forest Schweitzer (Undergraduate Junior, Environmental Studies B.A. – Sustainability Track), and Olivia Corriere (Undergraduate Sophomore, Environmental Studies B.A. – Sustainability Track, Geography Minor).

Analysis of the Pit by Bronwyn Bishop (Undergraduate Senior, Environmental Studies B.A. – Sustainability Track, Writing for the Screen and Stage Minor) and Joe Young (Senior, Environmental Science B.S., Mathematics Minor).

Featured Image: The Pit at UNC Chapel Hill. Photo Credit: UNC Admissions

A Brief Guide to Durham’s Alleyways

Alley. A narrow passage between or behind buildings.

This definition is too vague. I prefer (my own):

Alley. A narrow passage between or behind buildings that provides auxiliary access.

With this definition in mind, what follows is a list of Durham’s alleys. This list is by no means exhaustive; we’d love to hear about those you’ve explored that didn’t make it on this list.

alley1

Alley 26. Photo Credit: Rachel Wexler.

Right at the nexus of downtown, this beaut is hard to miss. This repurposed and highly intentional spot is so quaint that you kind of hate it.

alley2.png

Between 101 W. Chapel Hill Street and 353 W. Main Street. Photo Credit: Rachel Wexler.

Take a trip down this brand new red brick road to your downtown delights, or your parked car (depending on the direction you’re heading). Connecting a large parking complex to downtown amenities, this auto-to-foot gateway primes you for your culinary, commercial, banking, musical, or pharmaceutical adventures in Durham.

alley3.png

At the corner of Fuller and W. Corporation. Photo Credit: Rachel Wexler.

While not technically an alley, this botanically-endowed stretch of train tracks is where you’ll find the next pony express to Narnia. So it is indeed an alternative route considering that one would generally look to a wardrobe to reach such a destination.

alley4.png

8 Alley. Photo Credit: Rachel Wexler.

Minimal yet whimsical. Ignore the dumpsters to your right and the crunch of gravel beneath your feet will transport you to pre-pavement yesteryear. This alternative route gives you access to the bustling Ninth Street commercial corridor or the wacky businesses tucked behind the street-front stores.

alley5

Extension of 2 Alley. Photo Credit: Rachel Wexler.

The grand finale!

What!? Yes. Though not on public property, this Peter Pan dream is free for the looking. A mini ropes course that ends in the best club house around is located off of an unpresuming alley in Trinity Park. While not legitimized by Google maps, this alley is an extension of “2 Alley.” Access this focal point behind White Star Laundry.

What have we missed and what have you urban wanderers found?

About the Author: Rachel Wexler is the co-editor of the Carolina Planning Journal and pursuing her master’s degree in City and Regional Planning. Her bachelor’s is in english from UC Berkeley; prior to beginning her master’s she worked as an editor, cook, and musician. Her academic work focuses on economic development, neighborhood revitalization, and placemaking. Her non-academic work focuses on playing in general and playing cello in particular. She also thinks frequently about Oakland, California and Berlin, Germany, both of which she calls home. These are also the urban spaces that brought her to this charming small town to study planning.

Black Diamond: a UNC alumni-curated Third Space in downtown Greensboro

Cities are centers of activity and development with landscapes that reflect the ever-evolving pace of our lifestyles. The evolution of human activity is marked by the built environment we impose on the natural landscape. As the pace of societal change increased—whether from the horse to the car, the telegraph to the smartphone, the general store to the shopping malls—our built environments were molded to accommodate our latest lifestyle preferences. At some point along the way, we began to lose our relationship with open spaces and, consequently, our connection with one another.

urban-isolation

Urban isolation. Credit: MVMXVM

As a group of recently graduated UNC-Chapel Hill students, we decided to move to Greensboro and join UNCG graduate David Myers to bring to life our dream of a more connected community.

community-engagement

David Myers (left) and Thais Weiss (right) talk at Black Diamond. Photo: Gray Johnston

Black Diamond: a Public Backyard aims to restore and rekindle these connections that our bustling lifestyles have neglected. Black Diamond is an emerging third space, a place where folks can engage, learn, and re-connect through outdoor activities in a casual atmosphere. We’re located between two Greensboro neighborhoods, along the edge of downtown and directly adjacent to the future Downtown Greenway.

photo-of-downtown-greensboro_google-maps

Black Diamond (located at the gray marker) is blocks from downtown Greensboro. Source: Google Maps

planting-1

DeAngelo Bowden is a Greensboro native, and attends Appalachian State University. He is completing his capstone project at Black Diamond. Photo: Gray Johnston

We are creating a place that encourages people to slow down and reconnect in ways that are meaningful to them. Whether it be through gardening, music, art, yoga or potluck dinners—our public backyard provides people the resources they need to reconnect with one another and their environment. On a larger scale, we see our public backyard as part of a growing movement that is recapturing and redefining the value of open spaces as third spaces.

Third spaces are public places on neutral ground in a community where people can gather and interact. In contrast, the first and second spaces are home and work.  Third spaces host the regular, voluntary, informal, and happily anticipated gathers of individuals.[1] While these spaces have typically been defined as coffee shops, bars or sidewalks, the growing third space movement is being translated to open urban spaces.

Although open space is limited in many cities, what these third urban spaces lack in acreage, they make up for in terms of social value. Since many first and second spaces operate within our fast paced lifestyles, they subsequently encourage the development of our built environments, and often at the expense of open space. The value in redefined third spaces is that they operate outside of fast paced lifestyles and encourage the preservation of open spaces.

green

As a third space, Black Diamond values the preservation of open space. Photo: Gray Johnston

We moved to Greensboro because we see in these almost two acres of land the opportunity to reimagine what urban living is. Greensboro is affordable, culturally diverse, centrally located in North Carolina, relatively walkable and bikeable, and has preserved much of its greenery.  Like-minded people and projects are popping up all around the city, such as Greensboro Project Space and Forge Greensboro! The people, their projects and the 5 Universities in the city amount to a fertile environment for collaborations.

Since arriving in May we have begun collaborating with a Guilford College student to build garden beds, an Appalachian State University student who is a Greensboro native for his capstone project, a UNCG researcher to install beehives, and both The Arc of Greensboro  and The Arc of High Point for a community-based art project on our fence. We are also in search of donations to build a stage and a shaded area. Ultimately, we are using this space to creatively and critically engage our community.

To learn more about third spaces and our public backyard please visit our website or contact us via social media.

[1] http://www.pps.org/reference/roldenburg/

About the authors:

Gray Johnston was born and raised in Greensboro. As a recent graduate from UNC Chapel Hill with a BA in Environmental Policy, the idea of coming back home to work on a project related to the environment and community planted a seed in his head. After studying sustainable city design in Spain and Germany, Gray was inspired to pursue all of his passions and desires to live a sustainable life. He now works as an editor for Climate Stories NC, a multimedia storytelling project about North Carolinians whose lives have been affected by changes in the climate.

Thais Weiss was born and raised in Brazil and immigrated to the United States with her family in 2005. She is a recent UNC-Chapel Hill graduate with a double major in Global Studies and Geography. Thais has developed a strong interest in sustainable development and communities. In 2015, she traveled to Spain and Germany to study renewable energy and sustainable city design. Aside from being a member of Black Diamond, Thais is Administrative Assistant for the Global Engagement at UNC-Greensboro.

Molly Fisher is a recent graduate from UNC Chapel Hill where she studied geology and history. After studying sustainable cities abroad in Spain and Germany, Molly has become interested in the development of ecologically-minded communities. In addition to her work with Black Diamond, Molly is a Process Improvement & Quality Specialist for Classic Graphics, a manufacturing company in Charlotte.

 

Reviving Wasted Pavement

How should we use public space in downtown cores? What is the social role of parks? What form can community action take?

Angles sat down with environmental studies and city planning student Caroline Lindquist, a senior undergraduate at UNC-Chapel Hill, to find out. We discuss the parklet she and her friends designed, built, and enjoyed on September 16th, known fondly by guerrilla urbanists throughout as “PARK(ing) Day”.


Angles: What is PARK(ing) Day?

Caroline Lindquist: PARK(ing) Day is an “annual open-source global event” where citizens transform parking spaces into temporary public spaces or parklets for the day. The event began in 2005 in San Francisco with a design studio called Rebar, that created its own parklet for a day. The mission of PARK(ing) Day is “to call attention to the need for more urban open space, to generate critical debate around how public space is created and allocated.”

A: How did you set up the park? Did you need permission to use the space?

CL: To build the Chapel Hill parklet, we gathered our group of friends who studied sustainable community design through the Burch Study Abroad Seminar in Spain and Germany in 2015. We all brought different items from our houses such as carpets, plants, chairs, sofas, tables, anything that we thought could help make a fun public space. We then bought two big rolls of astroturf and rolled them out to lay the groundwork for the parklet (because what’s a park without some green?) After arranging basic seating, we drew a checkerboard on the pavement with chalk and added a little putt-putt green to encourage activity in the space.

2

The parklet on Franklin Street in downtown Chapel Hill, NC. The park included household furniture, a putt-putt green, and potted plants. Photo: Caroline Lindquist

Did we need permission? Technically no. The original creators of Parking Day, looked at the zoning code in San Francisco and other cities and saw that as long as you pay the parking meter, you can use the space however you want. The Director of the Chapel Hill Downtown Partnership, Meg McGurk, was extremely supportive and encouraging of PARK(ing) Day. Meg went out of her way to reserve parking spots for us, pay the meter, and even provide Starbucks gift cards for anyone who visited the park to use.

A: Who were some of the people who visited the park?

CL: The type of people who used the park varied throughout the day. In the morning, the parklet was mainly occupied by our set-up crew, some folks experiencing homelessness who helped us set up the parklet the year before, moms with young kids, and coffee shop patrons.

3

Sidewalk chalk entertained younger parklet visitors. Photo: Caroline Lindquist

In the afternoon, our friends stopped by, along with other UNC students, and those who heard about the event through social media or word of mouth.

By the evening, the sidewalks were heavily populated, since there was a home football game the next day. That was when more families and adults visited the parklet.

6

Early in the day, the parklet was hosted a variety of activities. People conversed, played music, and read. Photo: Caroline Lindquist

A: How was the space used throughout the day? What was the space like at 9am compared to 5 in the afternoon?

CL: Throughout the day, the space changed based on the sun orientation and the people who used the parklet. At 9am, the space was very basic with a few spots for seating, a picnic table, some couches, a bench. At mid-morning, we added balloons on the ‘No Parking’ cones to make the space more celebratory and inviting. We also added sidewalk chalk, which attracted some of the younger children walking by. In the afternoon, a friend brought by a foosball table and a soccer ball. We turned the astroturf section of the parklet into a mini soccer field using the ‘No Parking’ cones for goals.

A: What do you hope creating the parklet accomplished?

CL: I think this parklet showed people how much public space is devoted to the automobile (the sheer size of a parking spot is statement enough). Many people could not believe that all the parklet space was just two parking spots.

The parklet was a testament how public spaces strengthen community by encouraging interaction between different members of society (students, children, professionals, homeless, elderly) that may otherwise never meet.

The park also encouraged people to take more ownership of their city by transforming spaces to better reflect community values.

img_7517

By the evening, the parklet truly evolved into a social space. Photo: Brian Vaughn

 

 

A: What urban designers inspire you?

CL: Though she’s not a designer, Jane Jacobs is one of my greatest inspirations. She was a journalist, author, and activist who criticized urban designs of the day, saying that they did not reflect the needs of city dwellers. The urban realm should be designed to the human scale to encourage ‘eyes on the street.’

Ghigo DiTomasso, a professor of mine at Berkeley is another major source of inspiration. He works for Gehl Studios, a world-renowned urban design firm, on activating public spaces and using tactical urbanism.

Lastly, Thomas Woltz, a landscape architect has inspired me with is urban design projects (such as the Hudson Yards project in New York City) because of the way he focuses on revealing the intersection between landscape ecology and cultural history with his work.

A: What projects are you working on right now? 

CL: Right now, I am doing an independent study on the psychology of biophilic urban design. My work is focused on understanding the mental health benefits of integrating nature into cities as well as the psychology behind designing successful public spaces. I am using Dix Park in Raleigh as my case study, which was a mental health hospital before the land was bought by the City in 2015. I am also serving on the Dix Park Master Plan Advisory Committee, where I have the opportunity to help with the planning process and design of the new park.

dix5

Dix Park in Raleigh. Credit: City of Raleigh Parks & Recreation


About the Author

Caroline Lindquist is a senior at UNC majoring in Environmental Studies and minoring in City and Regional Planning. Her primary interests are biophilic design, tactical urbanism, and landscape architecture. She has spent the past two summers studying renewable energy in Spain and Germany and studying Urban Design at UC Berkeley. Caroline currently serves on the Dix Park Master Plan Advisory Committee for the City of Raleigh. 

Feature Photo: Caroline Lindquist

Planners for Public Pools

On hot days when I was a kid, my mom would occasionally load the car with a bag of towels and sunscreen and take my sisters and me to the pool. We rolled down all four windows to feel the breeze that lasted for the 20 sticky minutes it took to get there. I remember the blue-green water, thick with children’s bodies, shouting and waving and turning flips. While the pool was never particularly clean, I don’t ever remember caring. It was a break from the hot and desperate boredom of summer vacation.1

big-spring-texas

1947 postcard of midcentury pool aesthetics. Credit: Postcard Roundup

While planners love parks in many forms – from wild conservation areas and landscaped public parks to community gardens, pop-up pocket parks, and park(ing) day – they don’t always think of public pools as parks. But pools function as parks in many ways: they invite physical activity, recreation, communion, and chance interaction with strangers. The unique and intimate public realm of the municipal pool – people take off their clothes when they go to the pool and basically share an oversized bathtub – has a storied history. By revisiting this history, we can see the influence of the public pool on health, environment, and social outcomes that planners care about.

The oldest pool known to man is the 5,000-year-old Great Bath of Mohenjodaro in what is now Pakistan. The pool is so beloved that the its geometric architecture is depicted on Pakistan’s currency. Millennia later, the Romans used public pools for sport and military training. But for most of human history, public pools offered a place for bathing, and this tradition continues in public bathhouses across the world.

Mohenjo-daro

Ancient pool, Mohenjodaro in Pakistan. Credit: Saqib Qayyum

In the United States, too, the public pool was a place for getting clean throughout the nineteenth century. As Jeff Wiltse describes in Contested Waters: A Social History of Swimming Pools in America, early public pools were segregated by sex and by social class, but not by race or ethnicity. Working class immigrants, African-Americans, and Anglo whites all enjoyed the public pools together during times set aside for women and for men.

10832_8-19-1936_Hamilton Fish Pool with Play Center in background-lg

Hamilton Fish Pool in New York City, 1936. Built by the Works Progress Administration. Source: NYC Department of Parks and Recreation

The early twentieth century saw an explosion in recreational swimming, which inspired creativity in swimming pool design and size. This was also the era of segregation, and as public policy created and enforced black-white segregation in cities, municipal leaders implemented segregation in public pools. As symbols of Jim Crow and broader segregation, pools became a centerpiece of civil rights resistance.

Pullen-Park-Pool-August-7-1962-_-Flickr-Photo-Sharing.html-350x262

Six young men protest Jim Crow by taking a dip. Credit: Universal Pops Flickr user. This photo is part of an exhibit at the Raleigh City Museum, Raleigh, North Carolina.

As Wiltse writes, public pools were community resources over which claims for racial justice were articulated. In 1962, for instance, four black swimmers and two white swimmers entered Raleigh’s white-only Pullen Park Pool together in protest. The City of Raleigh shuttered the pool in response, although it was later reopened and eventually replaced with the indoor Pullen Aquatic Center. Many cities closed pools rather than integrate them, a practice deemed constitutional by the Supreme Court in the 1971 case Palmer v. Thompson because it denied all residents, not just some, access to pools.

Connect-Four-Up-Close-Photo-Credit-Monica-Peters

Swimming isn’t the only pool activity at Philadelphia’s Pop-Up Pool Project. Credit: Monica Peters, Knight Foundation

Fifty years later, many public pools serve neighborhoods or cities that still have de facto segregation, but as with any community asset, thoughtful outreach and community-building projects can help cross social and racial boundaries. Public pools have enormous social, health-related, and design potential. Planners should take inspiration from projects that have recognized the twenty-first century potential for the public pool as a community asset: In Philadelphia, the pilot Pop-Up Pool Project breathed new life into the concrete surroundings of the public pool by adding “low-cost/high-design” elements like playful furniture. Similarly, in North Minneapolis, swimmers enjoy the first modern pool that is kept clean by an ecological system and filtered by plants instead of chemicals (the pool vacuum also helps). City Lab reports on floating pools, some with swimmers and some still on paper, that rest in natural bodies of water like New York City’s East River. These projects demonstrate the potential for pools to help us move toward many different kinds of social and environmental goals.

What is the name of your favorite pool? Let us know in the Comments.

Featured Image: Pop-Up Pool Project in Philadelphia. Credit: John S. and James L. Knight Foundation

1 While writing this article, I talked to my mom about taking us to the pool. It turns out that she can only ever remember going to the indoor pool with us! The indoor pool had its own allure, with its frigid water and large group showers where adults dared to roam without even a bathing suit on.

About the Author

Amanda Whittemore Martin is an AICP-certified city planner and PhD student at UNC. She has done work in D.C., Nevada, New Orleans, Rhode Island, and across the southeastern states. Her research focuses on strategies that direct public and private investments toward shared prosperity, with a special focus on economic resilience in coastal communities. She holds a BA from Harvard and a master’s degree from MIT, and she loves to go swimming.

Street Seats: a student-designed parklet in NYC

On the corner of New York City’s 13th Street and 5th Avenue, hundreds of people use the sidewalk adjacent to The New School University Center every day. For a university in Manhattan, “campus” is a loose term that defines the parts of the city traversed by its students. Union Square Park—a magnet of public life—is a proximate and popular space for students and faculty to relax outside, though there is a noticeable lack of activities taking place there. Aside from the park, public seating is otherwise nonexistent in these highly trafficked parts of Manhattan. To approach this challenge, the city’s Department of Transportation’s (DOT) created a parklet initiative: Street Seats.

union square park.JPG

Union Square Park. Photo: chensiyuan

The New School’s relationship with the DOT began last year when the first iteration of Street Seats was built. Ten architecture students volunteered to redesign an on street parking space in merely two weeks. They built off of the standard design provided by the DOT, then constructed and installed the design themselves. Because of the overwhelmingly positive response to the parklet, The New School’s School of Constructed Environments created a course called “Design Build” open to students of any major.

2015-street-street-platform-customizable-design-new-school-manhattan

The New School’s 2015 Parklet. Photo: NYC DOT

This semester, fourteen fellow students and I formed an interdisciplinary team to  design, construct, and install a parklet in little more than three months. Whereas last year’s Street Seats was twenty five feet long, this year’s was approved for forty feet. With more time and space allowed, our group had the ability to develop a more complex design.

Rendering Street Seating 2016.jpg

A rendering of the 2016 parklet. Photo: Camille Petricola and fellow students

The parklet will bring together the University community and the public for the spring and summer months. With a generous amount of planters and movable seating, this public seating area will be an evolving space over it’s seven month lifespan and will set a precedent for next year’s design.

Tubes-Rendering II

The parklet, created with multiple tubes of many heights, encourages a diversity of uses. Photo: Camille Petricola and fellow students

Featured photo: The New School Community enjoying the 2016 parklet. Photo: Camille Petricola

Camille Petricola has lived in multiple cities around these United States but considers herself a native Pittsburgher. She majors in Communication Design at Parsons School of Design in New York City, where she focuses on urbanism and public space. Her favorite color is cobalt blue.

Seven Creative Placemaking Resources

It’s that time of year again: the Carolina Planning Journal is being copyedited and proofread and then copyedited and proofread again. And it is looking very beautiful. So: we’ve compiled a list of seven creative placemaking resources in order to get all of you excited about this upcoming volume, “Just Creativity: Perspectives on Inclusive Placemaking.”

  1. ArtPlace’s Blog Series called “The Huddle”

ArtPlace is a funder for creative placemaking projects all across the United States. This blog series spotlights “conversations” between projects and organizations funded by ArtPlace, in which they “talk through topics, get advice, and perhaps even gossip a little.” It’s a great source for local governments or people interested in creative placemaking. This series was launched in January 2016 and has already published a great piece on the funding landscape.

  1. January 2016 Volume of the Architectural Review: Culture

This volume of the Architectural Review is introduced with a challenge: “When it comes to cultural vibrancy, it is not simply a case of build it, and they will come. There is nothing more likely to put off a collective of artists than the sanitized insertion of a new-build cultural campus or the top-down creation of an artists’ village…A better investment would be the careful identification and preservation of urban subculture where it currently exists. Supporting these communities with cultural buildings, and providing long-term controlled cheap rent and subsidized start-up and studio space to keep the community together, is critical.”

  1. Volume 10 of the San Francisco Federal Reserve’s Community Development Investment Review

This volume of the Community Development Investment Review has pieces written by creative placemaking heavyweights like Ann Markusen, Darren Walker and Xavier de Souza Briggs of the Ford Foundation, Rip Rapson of the Kresge Foundation, and Jamie Bennett of ArtPlace. Two particularly helpful articles: one on financing creative places from Deutsche Bank and another on evaluation indicators from the Urban Institute.

  1. ArtForce Website

North Carolina-based ArtForce is a great resources for communities in the state that would like to create, build, and retain their creative economies.

3. Gehl Architects

The firm that helped turn Copenhagen into a bike-ped haven. These folks have developed the Public Space/Public Life survey model and have transformed many underused public spaces into famous icons of public street-life vitality. Gehl Architects piloted “Broadway Boulevard” in New York City in which for one day all major squares along Broadway were closed to automobile traffic and temporary furniture was moved in.

2. Projects for Public Spaces

PPS is a New York City-based firm known for pioneering public placemaking. It offers weekend long trainings on topics like how to create a successful and thriving public market and placemaking implementation and management.

  1. The Carolina Planning Journal

The upcoming volume of the Carolina Planning Journal, of course! We can’t wait to share an interview with Ann Markusen, articles from the Rural Studio, the Steel Yard in Providence, Opportunity Threads here in North Carolina, and more. Preview the table of contents below!

Volume 41 ToC

Volume 41 cover

Sacred Spaces in Public Places

For those of us that identify as secular, the word sacred is often alienating and uncomfortable. The word can also seem mysterious, vague, and exclusionary. In its most basic sense, the word sacred means “set apart ” and sacred spaces can therefore be invaluable to secular people as well as those who participate in organized religion. We often talk about setting aside time for reflection but as a pastor, I think “setting apart” space is just as important as “setting apart” time. In a time of high consumerism and information overload, we are always on-the-go to accomplish yet another task on our to-do lists. I believe we are, more than ever, in need of sacred spaces: places set apart where we are encouraged to rest, reflect, and take a breath from the business of life. For those who are religious, these places provide space to worship and pray. But even for the non-religious, these places can be valuable for reflection and creative interaction.

Having sacred spaces in the public realm is particularly vital. Much like public art, sacred spaces invite and encourage participation and interaction while reminding the passerby of the importance of stopping, resting, and simply being in the moment, or, in religious language, practicing sabbath. Whether we spend a minute or an hour in a sacred space, this time can cultivate self-awareness while allowing us to see the vast connectedness of us with each other and our surroundings. Additionally, broader public spaces have the potential to attract  a diverse range of residents or community members into sacred spaces. In a world where interreligious and ecumenical relations are often wracked with tension, and many times violence, it is invaluable to provide public places where people of all faiths and secular belief systems can come to rest, rejuvenate, worship, and sabbath.

8462716295_5482fba2d6_z

A close-up view of the labyrinth at Georgetown Waterfront Park in Washington, DC. Photo credit: Elvert Barnes

What could these sacred spaces look like? The possibilities are endless. A favorite example of mine is the paved labyrinth at Georgetown Waterfront Park in Washington, D.C. Labyrinths are ancient prayer tools and have been used in many faith traditions. As one walks the single path toward the center and back out again, the individual can become inwardly-focused despite the sounds from the world around, allowing for prayer, reflection, or meditation. Labyrinths are especially unique because they encourage the connection between the mind, body, and soul. As one walks, one is attuned to one’s embodiment as well as one’s emotional and spiritual states. Most labyrinths include a guide or suggested way to experience them. People are invited to experience them using the prescribed method but are not required.

8463697470_7e865ec125_z

A guide to the Georgetown Waterfront Park Labyrinth in Washington, DC. Photo credit: Elvert Barnes

Any space has the potential to be sacred (“set apart”) because no physical thing automatically makes any space a sacred one. Religious iconography or symbols do not make a particular space sacred or spiritual. Sacred spaces become categorized as sacred because an individual recognizes them as such. Spaces become meaningful because we make them meaningful, through experiences, memories, and symbols that evoke them. Yet the physicality of a space lends itself to encourage or discourage the opportunity of experiencing a space as sacred. The labyrinth provides a public space the opportunity to become sacred for those interacting with it. The same can be said for a botanical garden or greenway or even the public swings that were recently installed in Nashville’s Riverfront Park. The space has no agenda for its participant, sets no expectation of producing a product, and leaves room for the participant to reflect, imagine, interact with others and/or nature, or just be attuned to one’s own needs.

WP_20150801_005

Swinging benches at Riverfront Park in Nashville, TN. Photo credit: Chris Bendix.

Having sacred spaces within the public realm is important. These spaces are set apart from their surroundings so as to encourage personal reflection, but are also open to the public so as to support community building. As a result, sacred space can promote mental health, peaceful religious (and non-religious) coexistence, and a deeper sense of self.

How might one go about designing a sacred space? First, the space must invite and encourage interaction while also allowing for diverse interpretations and experiences of the space. Second, as much as sacred spaces are metaphorically “set apart” from their surroundings, they are physically within communities themselves. In this way, sacred spaces have the potential to be gathering places that reflect the character and focus of a neighborhood or city. Work with neighborhood leaders, both religious and secular, to design a space that can be embraced by the whole of the neighborhood. Finally, be creative! How might we rethink abandoned lots, monotonous stairways, or harsh sidewalks or alleyways so as to create an inviting, hospitable space that brings life, energy, and respite to the surrounding neighborhood or city?

Click here to view a previous post about public space just down the road in Carrboro, NC.

About the author: Keller Hawkins is a second-year divinity student at Vanderbilt Divinity School in her hometown of Nashville, TN. Raised by two socially-conscious landscape architects, she has always had an interest in the relationship between public spaces and social justice. Keller is on track to be an ordained pastor in the United Methodist Church and seeks to carry out her ministry creatively, sustainably, and with an ultimate focus on community.

« Older posts