Bridging Theory and Practice Since 1974

Tag: Carolina Planning Journal (Page 1 of 2)

Angles of Reflection: Planning for the Phone Age

By Joe Wilson

This week in Chapel Hill a new year began. Thousands of students converged upon UNC’s campus (a select few upon New East, home of Carolina Planning) to begin the annual academic cycle, just as they have in innumerable seasons past. For Angles, though, this year is a special one. It is the blog’s tenth anniversary, an occasion which we believe merits celebration and contemplation.

Throughout the year, we will be publishing a series called “Angles of Reflection,” in which writers will engage in conversation with posts from the blog’s archive and explore how the field has changed  — and how it has not — over the years. To kick things off, we’re going back to one of its earliest posts, Planning for the Phone Age

Originally written in 2013 for Changing Media’s The Good Plan, this piece, by DCRP alum Lindsay Davis, took a look at the increasing distractions that smartphones were proving to be. Even at that time, Davis noted how they took people out of their physical surroundings, often to the detriment of interpersonal connection. “This,” she wrote, “leaves a new task up to cities — integrating the self and the cellphone into the public realm.”

A decade later, Davis’s words feel prescient. The self and the cellphone are by now intimately integrated, and devices guide our movement through the public realm almost like another sense. Beyond their use as tools — restaurant menus, bus passes — their influence extends into the very way we perceive ourselves and our places. GPS maps distort our sense of space and direction even as they increase our ability to get from one point to another. Group messages, digital classrooms and online forums take on many of the characteristics of social spaces. At a deep level, we relate ourselves to our screens, to our digital representations as dots on a map and text on a page. And, at times, this new sense of identity comes at the expense of our surroundings; our locations and our social interactions become more rooted in  information than experience.

Photo credit: Robin Worrall, Unsplash

Often, and understandably, the focus has been on the disorienting effects of these changes. GPS navigation and social media physically alter our brains. In recent years, with the rise of AI-generated text and images, the links between digital and physical reality have become tenuous. It’s enough to rattle the nerves of even the staunchest techie.

But there is also opportunity in this shake-up. Navigational tools can be designed to build, rather than replace, personal wayfinding abilities. Soundwalks like that of Chapel Hill’s Marian Cheek Jackson Center connect listeners not only to their immediate surroundings but also to the people and histories behind them. Social media, for all its faults, has created havens of community for historically oppressed groups.

Fundamentally, the challenge remains the same today as it did in 2013. How can we — individuals, communities, organizations, cities — use devices to connect to our environments, instead of bypassing them? How can we use them to expand our consciousness, rather than restricting it?

The solutions, undoubtedly, will require deep reflection.

Joe Wilson is a second year master’s student in the Department of City and Regional Planning at UNC Chapel Hill, and the managing editor of Angles

Introducing Our New Editors

The days are long, cicadas loud, the DCRPeople scattered to jobs and internships and sunny vacations. Yes, it’s officially (according to the Registrar, at least) summertime!

We wish to offer congratulations to all recent graduates, but especially to Candela Cerpa and Kathryn Cunningham. As Editor-in-Chief of the Carolina Planning Journal and Managing Editor of Angles, respectively, Candela and Kathryn have worked hard over the past year to put together a journal and a blog packed full of thought-provoking reportage. Volume 49 of the JournalEveryday Life and the Politics of Place – will be out soon, so make sure to get your copy!

Candela Cerpa, Editor-in-Chief, Carolina Planning Journal Volume 49
Kathryn Cunningham, Managing Editor, Angles, 2023-2024

As we celebrate Candela and Kathryn, we’d also like to take the opportunity to introduce ourselves – their successors!

Samantha Pace | Editor-in-Chief, Carolina Planning Journal

The next Editor-in-Chief of the Carolina Planning Journal will be Samantha Pace. Samantha is a third year in a dual Masters program in City and Regional Planning at UNC-Chapel Hill and Environmental Management at Duke University. She is interested in climate resilience and adaptation, public spaces, and urban design. After receiving her undergraduate degree in Industrial Design from North Carolina State University, she worked at a biotechnology start-up in Research Triangle Park for 3 years. In her free time, Samantha enjoys camping, live music, block printing, and making pizzas.

Joe Wilson | Managing Editor, Angles

Taking over as Managing Editor of Angles is Joe Wilson, a second-year master’s student in the Department of City and Regional Planning at UNC-Chapel Hill, where he is specializing in Housing and Community Development. Before returning to school, Joe worked as an assistant teacher in Carrboro and an urban education fellow in Brooklyn, experiences which continue to shape his understanding of and interest in cities. Outside of planning, Joe enjoys running, watching baseball, and visiting the zoo.


We are beyond excited to get to work on the next volume of the Journal and another year of insightful blog posts. The 2024/2025 academic year marks a major anniversary for both institutions – the 50th volume of the Carolina Planning Journal and the tenth year of Angles – and we have some big ideas to look forward to (and to look back on). If you’re interested in being a part, email carolinaplanningjournal@gmail.com or reach out to Samantha or Joe directly.


Post by Joe Wilson, Managing Editor, Angles

Introducing Our New Editors for 2023

The Carolina Planning Journal (CPJ) and ∆NGLES are excited to announce the editors for the 2023-2024 school year: Candela Cerpa and Kathryn Cunningham. Read on to learn more about them.


CANDELA CERPA | Editor-in-Chief, Carolina Planning Journal

Candela Cerpa is a second-year master’s student in the Department of City and Regional Planning at UNC-Chapel Hill. She is interested in equitable disaster planning, particularly around floods. Born and raised in Uruguay, she received her bachelor of science in Environmental Science and Policy from the University of Maryland, College Park. Outside of work and school, she enjoys cooking and eating good food, listening to audiobooks, and organizing around climate and social issues.

KATHRYN CUNNINGHAM | Managing Editor, Angles

Kathryn Cunningham is a second-year master’s student with the Department of City and Regional Planning whose interests include climate change adaptation, parks, and public space. She studied Environmental Studies at Williams College and before coming to graduate school, she was in the San Francisco Bay Area managing sustainability projects for a law school. When not in class, she enjoys reading, running, and checking out all of the many concert venues the Research Triangle has to offer.


Please join us in giving a huge thank you and congratulations to our outgoing editors Lance Gloss and Jo (Joungwon) Kwon! Lance has graduated with a Master of City and Regional Planning. Jo will be in her fifth year of her Ph.D. and will continue to be a part of CPJ in the 2023-2024 school year. Read on for reflections from the two editors.

I have loved serving the CPJ as Editor-in-Chief for the past year. So many minds came together to deliver this volume of the Journal; helping to guide that process was serious fun. Our writers delivered thought-provoking research and earned the fruits of building relationships with their editors. Our editors, too, were persistent and thoughtful, and all grew tremendously. Jo Kwon did an absolutely brilliant job managing Angles, leveling up the blog by all accounts. The staff at DCRP were there every step of the way to help connect the dots on logistics. Now, I know we are leaving the CPJ in excellent hands with Candela Cerpa and Kathryn Cunningham. As we go to print, I’m excited to hear from the rest of our team–that’s all of you, our readers–with your responses to the ideas the CPJ presents in Volume 48.

It was truly a pleasure to serve as the Managing Editor for Angles this past year. Working with such a talented and passionate group of individuals was an incredible experience. One of the things I loved most about my role as ME was the opportunity to work with such a diverse range of authors and editors. We had a diverse group of people, including seasoned professionals and up-and-coming students, working together to produce high-quality content that reflected a range of perspectives. As I step back, I’m confident Angles will continue to thrive under new leadership. Thank you for a memorable experience, and I look forward to supporting the journal and blog in 2023-2024.


Post by Kathryn Cunningham, Angles Managing Editor

Wrapping Up Spring 2023 with Carolina Planning Journal

In Spring 2022, the Carolina Planning Journal had a special year. We published sixteen blog posts and are set to publish Volume 48 on Urban Analytics: Capabilities and Critiques in mid-May. We also hosted Dr. Jamaal Green as a guest speaker in collaboration with DCRP DEI and DCRP’s Planning in Practice Speaker Series. Workshops on editing for the journal and a few social events were also held. Congratulations to Emma Vinella-Brusher, Cameron Mcbroom-Fitterer, Walker Harrison, Amy Patronella, Sarah Kear, Rene Marker-Katz, Henry Read, and Lance Gloss, who will soon graduate. Additionally, the CPJ looks forward to seeing the second and third-year students for more writing and editing next year.

Spring 2023 Posts:

  1. Happy New Year from the Carolina Planning Journal!
  2. Planning for 36 Hours in Fanwood, New Jersey by Kathryn Cunningham
  3. The case for a K-12 planning education by Isabel Soberal
  4. Too Big to Dismantle: Planning for Reuse of the Tarheel Army Missile Plant by Ian Baltutis
  5. Masters Student Panel on Master’s Project Proposal Development by Jo Kwon
  6. Wrestling with Equity: Dr. Jamaal Green Returns to DCRP by Lance Gloss
  7. Winter photo contest winner
  8. What prevents older LGBTQ+ adults from aging in place? An interview with Marisa Turesky, Urban Planning Ph.D. Candidate  by Candela Cerpa
  9. Planning for 36 Hours in Seattle, Washington by Nik Reasor
  10. Schoolyards: An Untapped Community Resource? by Emma Vinella-Brusher
  11. 1970’s Detroit Gets in a Twitter Feud by Abby Cover
  12. From the Archives) Film Analysis: Oil Culture in The Umbrellas of Cherbourg
  13. Planning for 36 Hours in Delhi, India by Ian Baltutis
  14. Planning for 36 Hours in Oakland, California by Kathryn Cunningham
  15. The Arctic: An Uncertain Time for Arctic Cooperation by Samantha Pace
  16. Planning for 36 Hours Stockholm, Sweden by Nik Reasor
Volume 48 Journal Editing Session
First Spring 2023 Meeting

Please follow us on LinkedIn and Facebook and wait for the new volume on Urban Analytics: Capabilities and Critiques in May 2023.

This will be our last post from 2022-23 editors. Thank you so much for a great Spring semester to everyone who read, wrote, and edited the volume and blog!

Your 2022-23 Editors:

LANCE GLOSS | Editor-in-Chief & JO KWON | Managing Editor

Lance is a second-generation urban planner with a passion for economic development strategies that center natural resource conservation and community uplift. He served as Managing Editor of the Urban Journal at Brown University, Section Editor at the College Hill Independent, and Senior Planner for the City of Grand Junction. Hailing from sunny Colorado, he earned his BA in Urban Studies at Brown and will earn his Master’s in City and Regional Planning in 2023. Outside of work, he can be found on his bicycle, in the woods, or on the rugby pitch.

Jo is a fourth-year Ph.D. student in City and Regional Planning with an interest in using visuals in environmental planning. She has been a part of CPJ since 2019. With a background in Statistics and English Literature, she received her M.A. in Computational Media at Duke University. In her free time, she enjoys indie films, live performances, climbing, and drinking coffee.

Announcing the Winner of the 2023 Winter Photo Contest & CPJ Cover Photo contest!

After a close competition, we are pleased to share the winning submission to this year’s Carolina Angles photo contest. Christy Fierros captured this image overlooking Tucson, Arizona, and shares her thoughts on its meaning below.

Christy’s winning photo will also be featured in Volume 48 of the Carolina Planning Journal, Urban Analytics, coming this spring. Thank you to everyone who participated, and congratulations to Christy!


The Catalina Mountains and ancient Saguaros witness an area in constant flux. After the Gadsden Purchase of 1854 annexed this area of Mexico into the United States, “The Old Pueblo” grew. While urban renewal schemes are well-known in many east-coast cities, few are recognized in the Southwest. In the 1960’s, Downtown (pictured), was targeted by the City in their “slum clearance” project. The nearly 400-acre area destroyed was multi-ethnic, but predominantly Chicanx and had walkable neighborhoods with adobe homes, small grocers, and shops—exactly the mix of uses that millions of dollars are being spent to emulate today.

As more people move to Tucson for its affordability, arid climate, and economic opportunities, the city grapples with improving its transportation systems. Tucson recently acquired federal funds to implement equitable Transit-Oriented Development (eTOD). A Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) system is proposed from this funding with a route crossing through areas of south Tucson where the median household income is $32K and rents are rapidly rising. While an improved public transit system and more dense development is badly needed, the BRT system represents a new spatial conflict for Tucson’s working-class who more often than not, bear the burden of land use decisions while others reap the benefits.

Many new, mixed-use and transit-oriented developments in the city core cater to higher income folks, university students, and tourists. The BRT project and new developments surrounding historic barrios look like gentrification to many communities in South Tucson. Mi Barrio No Se Vende (“My Neighborhood Is Not For Sale”) yard signs are scattered throughout. While the eTOD funding promises to expand affordable housing to prevent displacement, many hope history doesn’t repeat and the project funding stays true to its name.

Christy Fierros is a first-generation master’s student in the Department of City and Regional Planning specializing in Land Use and Environmental planning. She received a dual bachelor’s degree from the University of Arizona in Environmental Studies and Geography. She is passionate about making environmental injustices nonexistent and planning practices rooted in repair and respect. Hiking, bird watching, gardening, or looking at trees are just a few things that replenish her after a long day at the computer.


Looking for another opportunity to share your work? Submit to the CPJ Cover Photo contest!

The Carolina Planning Journal is now accepting submissions for the cover photo of this year’s journal, and we’d love to feature your image! Submissions should be related to this year’s journal theme, Urban Analytics: Capabilities and Critiques. Examples of previous cover images can be found at the journal’s online repository. If your photo is selected for the cover, you will receive $100 for the rights to use it in the journal as well as photo attribution.

To enter submit your high-resolution (min. 300 dpi) photo to carolinaplanningjournal@gmail.com with the subject “CPJ Cover Photo Submission,” along with a brief explanation of how your image relates to the journal’s theme. Contact the Journal with any further questions.

Your 2022-23 Editors:

LANCE GLOSS | Editor-in-Chief & JO KWON | Managing Editor

Lance is a second-generation urban planner with a passion for economic development strategies that center natural resource conservation and community uplift. He served as Managing Editor of the Urban Journal at Brown University, Section Editor at the College Hill Independent, and Senior Planner for the City of Grand Junction. Hailing from sunny Colorado, he earned his BA in Urban Studies at Brown and will earn his Master’s in City and Regional Planning in 2023. Jo (Joungwon) is a fourth-year Ph.D. student in City and Regional Planning with an interest in using visuals in environmental planning. She has been a part of CPJ since 2019. With a background in Statistics and English Literature, she received her M.A. in Computational Media at Duke University.

Happy New Year from the Carolina Planning Journal!

2022 was a special year for the Carolina Planning Journal! We published Volume 47 of our print journal on Planning for Healthy Cities. In the Fall of 2022, we had new writers and editors, including Ian Baltutis, Candela Cerpa, Abby Cover, Kathyrn Cunningham, Ryan Ford, Henry Read, Nik Reasor, Nicholas Stover, Isabel Soberal, Asher Eskind, and Chris Samoray, and our new faculty advisor Dr. Allie Thomas. We also had returning writers and editors Emma Vinella-Brusher, James Hamilton, Walker Harrison, Cameron Mcbroom-Fitterer, Amy Patronella, and Rene Marker-Katz. Angles had a busy semester with 32 posts and 16,797 views.

Summer & Fall 2022 Posts:

  1. Introducing Our New Editors for 2022
  2. Archive from 2021: A Queer People’s Atlas of Bull City: Exploring the History and Movement of Queer Bars in Durham, North Carolina (Part 1)
  3. 36 hours: Mérida, Yucatán
  4. 36 hours: Durham, North Carolina
  5. Volume 48 Call for Papers
  6. Machine Learning and Planning Research
  7. 36 hours: Madrid, Spain
  8. Archive from 2018: Undergrads analyze UNC spaces
  9. 36 hours: Lagos, Nigeria
  10. A Queer People’s Atlas of Bull City: Exploring the History and Movement of Queer Bars in Durham, North Carolina (Part 2)
  11. UNC’s Community Workshop Series (CWS)
  12. 36 hours: Dublin, Ireland
  13. Demilitarization or Militourism: “Act on Reconstruction of Cities that Formerly Served as Naval Ports” in Japan
  14. What are the Urbanists Listening to?
  15. Planner’s Playlist
  16. 36 hours: Cartegena, Columbia
  17. Southeast & Caribbean Disaster Resilience Partnership
  18. 2022 North Carolina APA Conference in Winston-Salem
  19. Reflections of the Center for Urban & Regional Studies (CURS) Roundtable on Governance and Smart Cities
  20. Boom Supersonic, North Carolina, and the Risks we Choose to Take 
  21. Subscriptions for CPJ Volume 47 on Planning for Healthy Cities
  22. 36 Hours: Reykjavik, Iceland
  23. Archive from 2017: How Hey Arnold inspired suburban millennials to dream about the city
  24. 36 Hours: Dallas, Texas
  25. Cheonggyecheon: A Revolution of Environment, Rule, and Interaction within Seoul  
  26. Drawing Lines is Hard and We Need to Be More Decisive About It
  27. Mitch Silver’s Real Talk on “Planning with Purpose”
  28. Comparing the Public and Private Decision-Making Process for the People’s Park Housing Project in Berkeley, CA
  29. Announcing the Carolina Angles Winter Photo Contest
  30. Women Are Needed in Spaces Where Decisions Are Being Made
  31. 36 Hours: Toulouse, France
  32. Archive from 2018: What XKCD Can Teach You About Planning

Please follow us on LinkedIn and Facebook and wait for the new volume on Urban Analytics: Capabilities and Critiques in May 2023.

Thank you so much for a great year to everyone who read, wrote, and edited the volume and blog. Here’s to another great year!

Your 2022-23 Editors:

LANCE GLOSS | Editor-in-Chief & JO KWON | Managing Editor

Lance is a second-generation urban planner with a passion for economic development strategies that center natural resource conservation and community uplift. He served as Managing Editor of the Urban Journal at Brown University, Section Editor at the College Hill Independent, and Senior Planner for the City of Grand Junction. Hailing from sunny Colorado, he earned his BA in Urban Studies at Brown and will earn his Master’s in City and Regional Planning in 2023. Outside of work, he can be found on his bicycle, in the woods, or on the rugby pitch. Jo (Joungwon) is a fourth-year Ph.D. student in City and Regional Planning with an interest in using visuals in environmental planning. She has been a part of CPJ since 2019. With a background in Statistics and English Literature, she received her M.A. in Computational Media at Duke University. In her free time, she enjoys indie films, live performances, climbing, and drinking coffee.

Announcing the Carolina Angles Winter Photo Contest

Do you have winter travel plans? Preparing for a holiday staycation? Either way, Carolina Angles invites you to participate in our Winter Photo Contest!

We encourage UNC planning students, alumni, and all urban enthusiasts to enter. Photos will be judged based on aesthetics as well as the articulated connection to planning.

The photographer of the winning photo will receive:

  • Recognition in the Carolina Planning Journal and Angles blog
  • Pre-order of Volume 48 of the Carolina Planning Journal, Urban Analytics (published in Spring 2023)
  • Carolina Planning Journal swag

Please use this google form to submit your photo and a brief blurb with how it relates to planning by Friday, January 27, 2023 at 5:00pm.

We look forward to your entries!

Featured Image courtesy of Duncan Richey’s Snowbird, Utah

Introducing Our New Editors for 2022

The Carolina Planning Journal (CPJ) and ∆NGLES are excited to announce the editors for the 2022-2023 school year: Lance Gloss and Joungwon Kwon. Read on to learn more about them.


LANCE GLOSS | Editor-in-Chief, Carolina Planning Journal

Lance is a second-generation urban planner with a passion for economic development strategies that center natural resource conservation and community uplift. He served as Managing Editor of the Urban Journal at Brown University, Section Editor at the College Hill Independent, and Senior Planner for the City of Grand Junction. Hailing from sunny Colorado, he earned his BA in Urban Studies at Brown and will earn his Master in City and Regional Planning at UNC-Chapel Hill in 2023. Outside of work, he can be found on his bicycle, in the woods, or on the rugby pitch.

JOUNGWON KWON | Managing Editor, Angles

Jo (Joungwon) Kwon is a fourth-year Ph.D. student in the Department of City and Regional Planning. She is interested in using visuals in plans, specifically in environmental planning. She has been a part of CPJ since 2019. With a background in Statistics and English Literature, she received her M.A. in Computational Media at Duke University. In her free time, she enjoys watching indie films, going to live performances, and drinking good coffee. This summer Jo will be working on her proposal on the role of visuals in planning.


Please join us in giving a huge thank you and congratulations to our outgoing editors Pierce Holloway and Emma Vinella-Brusher! Pierce has graduated with a Master of City and Regional Planning. Emma will be in her third year and will continue to be a part of CPJ in Fall 2022. Read on for reflections from the two editors.

I had the pleasure of serving as the Editor-in-Chief for the previous year which was a great education on the art of coordination. It was an exciting role to fill, paralleling the return to campus for our department as well as UNC. I learned how to be a better communicator and project manager from the myriad of authors and editors I worked with. My role allowed me to learn just how many moving parts are required to take a journal from an idea to a fully-fledged published journal you can hold in your hands. A massive thank you goes out to all the students, authors, and departmental staff that offered their time to make this year’s journal a success! I will continue to be thankful for the experience and look forward to seeing how the journal evolves with each year’s cohorts.

This past year was another busy one for the Carolina Angles blog. As Managing Editor, I was lucky enough to work with over a dozen talented authors, editors, and content creators to showcase the incredible work happening at both UNC and within the broader planning community. From the impact of tech on housing affordability, to the history of Durham’s queer bars, to the role structural racism plays in food access, Angles explored the challenges and opportunities within the field of planning from a variety of perspectives. I am so grateful for this experience, and am looking forward to taking a step back from my leadership role this coming year while continuing to support both the print journal and online blog. CPJ is in great hands with the rising leadership team, and I’m so excited to watch the journal and blog continue to grow!


Post by Jo Kwon, Angles Managing Editor

Book Review from the Journal: Urban Legends, Peter L’Official

In anticipation of Volume 47 of the Carolina Planning Journal coming out next month, this week we are featuring another book review from Volume 46, The White Problem in Planning. Veronica Brown reflects on Peter L’Official’s Urban Legends: The South Bronx in Representation and Ruin.

Book Review by Veronica Brown

A few televised moments speak to their era so well that they surpass television history and stand in for an entire period in American history. Surely the 1988 World Series, in which the camera panned from Yankee Stadium to a burning building in the South Bronx as Howard Cosell announced, “Ladies and gentlemen, the Bronx is burning,” is such a moment. Except for the fact that Cosell never said his most famous line. Peter L’Official debunks this story in the introduction to Urban Legends: The South Bronx in Representation and Ruin, an exploration of how during the late twentieth century, various media constructed a South Bronx that stood in for both the concept of urban decline and for the place itself. When presidents visited the rubble of Charlotte Street, as L’Official writes, they “did not visit the ‘South Bronx’ as much as they did the site of the nation’s shorthand for urban ruin” (129). Through thoughtful analysis of the period’s visual art, books, and movies, L’Official provides a necessary reexamination of the South Bronx’s history that also serves as a compelling argument that places are constructed not only through plans but through their artistic representations.

In the strongest two chapters of the book, L’Official pairs the photographs of Jerome Liebling and Roy Mortenson and the conceptual work of Gordon Matta-Clark with examples of what he terms “municipal art” (14), or work with a function that is bureaucratic as much as aesthetic. This “art, at work” (46) includes the Department of Finance’s project to photograph every lot in New York City from 1983 to 1987 in order to standardize the city’s tax assessment system. In this “administrative mode” (77) of photography, life emerges at the corners of straight-on photos of South Bronx buildings caught in the process of abandonment. Passersby move from one photo to the next as the city photographer progresses down the block. Situating these tax photos within a rich tradition of artists depicting urban ruin, including through conceptual photography, L’Official creates a “dual-purposed ethic of viewership” (76). This mode of looking considers the art-historical canon as well as sociopolitical upheaval in the urban environment. In another inspired pairing, L’Official uses the work of Gordon Matta-Clark and the Occupied Look program, two forms of urban trompe l’oeil, to demonstrate how perception and perspective shaped understandings of the South Bronx. Through Occupied Look, the actual windows of abandoned buildings were covered with panels with painted-on windows. Occupied Look presents itself as an easy subject for derision, but L’Official rejects cynical mockery, instead comparing the initiative to Gordon Matta-Clark’s building cuts in the Bronx Floors series. L’Official’s deft exploration of these various artistic interventions in Bronx abandonment proves municipal art projects as worthy of analysis and also figures the period’s conceptual artists as key urban theorists of twentieth-century decline.

In later chapters, L’Official turns to popular media depictions of the South Bronx, including books and movies, and continues to home in on well-chosen details. In a particularly gratifying turn, the main character of Abraham Rodriguez’s Spidertown (1993) has a scavenged Occupied Look window mounted on his bedroom wall, literally reversing the direction of the faux portal and co-opting its furtive purpose as he hides his cash behind the panel. The 1981 films Fort Apache, the Bronx and Wolfen each center on Charlotte Street, a block sufficiently metonymic for urban distress that Jimmy Carter staged a photo opportunity there when he visited the borough in 1977. In Fort Apache, the Bronx, both character and setting assume the identity of Charlotte Street. Pam Grier, the ultimate blaxploitation star, plays a sex worker named after the street. The film received significant protests from the local organization Committee Against Fort Apache, which argued that the film was reductive and offensive. Charlotte Street, however, had become a studio backdrop rather than a neighborhood with residents, a transformation made clear through the construction of a new building that appeared to be burnt-out for the production of Wolfen. Although L’Official does not extend his analysis of Charlotte Street to Ed Logue’s zealous development of the corridor into a row of single-family homes in 1987, recently detailed in Lizabeth Cohen’s Saving America’s Cities (2019), the aestheticization of the street through its movie appearances demonstrates why the American aesthetic ideal of the white-picket fence would be all the more appealing as a solution to the borough’s problems.

Full of both rich detail and exciting ideas, Urban Legends is an enjoyable book for any audience interested in the South Bronx, but the book provides a particularly important meeting ground for urban planners and historians of visual culture. As L’Official argues, the South Bronx “has been hard to ‘see’ clearly beneath the layers of myths, stereotype, and urban legend” (245). Urban planners have historically failed to see the Bronx and used its representation to obscure a clear vision of countless Black and Latinx urban neighborhoods across the country. This pattern has fostered rampant exploitation of these neighborhoods, including current gentrification and displacement in the South Bronx. What is perhaps most useful for planners to take from Urban Legends is an understanding of how representations will continue to construct the space. When L’Official asks “What vision of the Bronx will live on” (247), planners should recognize this vision will not only be constituted through their efforts but also through art and popular media.

Buy Urban Legends here.

Find Volume 46 of the Carolina Planning Journal online here.


Veronica Brown is a 2021 graduate of the Master’s of City and Regional Planning program. She received her undergraduate degree from Smith College, where she studied the psychology of contemporary visual culture. Before coming to UNC, Veronica worked in communications at the Whitney Museum of American Art.

Book Review from the Journal: Golden Gates, Conor Dougherty

This week, we are featuring another book review from Volume 46 of the Carolina Planning Journal, The White Problem in Planning. Nora Louise Schwaller reflects on Conor Dougherty’s Golden Gates: Fighting for Housing in America.

Book Review by Nora Louise Schwaller

There is no state where an individual working a full-time minimum-wage job can afford a one-bedroom housing unit without paying in excess of 30% of their income, the standard benchmark for affordability. While stagnant wage growth has contributed to this issue, an increasing imbalance between supply and demand in the housing market is a major feature of the problem. In Golden Gates: Fighting for Housing in America, Conor Dougherty focuses on the ever-growing housing shortage by sharing stories from those living in the cities of the Bay Area, California. In doing this, Dougherty lends insight into the economics, laws, history, and human experiences behind the rising housing prices and reasons why ‘The Rent is Too Damn High’.

Dougherty is well suited to this task. He is both a Bay Area native and current resident. He works as an economics reporter for the New York Times, focusing on the West Coast, real estate, and wage stagnation. His experience allows him to write with both the sober perspective of a researcher and the insight of someone who has lived in the midst of this evolving crisis. This background gives him credible authority to note that he has never seen it quite so bad.

In San Francisco, the average rent for a 1-bedroom apartment is $2,650. Dougherty delves into the history of how we got here with clear-sighted nuance. The real-life characters in his book veer to polarized ends of the debate (e.g., affordable housing advocates who don’t want to see developers make a profit, or local residents who use racist dog-whistle comments to discuss the “horrors” of new housing construction). However, Dougherty balances the risks of displacement and homelessness with the practicalities of having the means to make money in and from a competitive housing market. In doing so, he gives fair consideration to those who often become the local villains of housing scarcity – the techies in their Google Buses, the developers, and suburban natives – by contextualizing them in the biases and incentive structures of local governments that often limit dense construction.

Dougherty anchors his book with Sonja Trauss, the founder of the Yes in My Back Yard (YIMBY) activism movement. The book begins with her first appearance at a public hearing where she spoke in favor of more housing just about anywhere in the Bay Area. She was nearly 30 then, an economics PhD drop-out oscillating between teaching math and working at a local bakery. At this time of her life, she was long on passion but short on concentration – with a list of discarded hobbies that included weight lifting, role playing games, and participating in comedy troupes. Affordable rent advocacy focused her, and before long, she was showing up at any public hearing on residential construction, from affordable mid-rises to high end apartments, asking them to build anything so long as it was more.

Her organization, coined San Francisco Bay Area Renters Federation (SF BARF), gave a voice to the disparate group of people who were hurt by the non-building of homes that they could have lived in, or that could have at least put downward pressure on rents. This was a marked shift in housing advocacy that expanded the conversation around new construction far beyond local residents and the project developers, the typical stakeholders. Her ‘build everything’ position, habit of inserting herself in local fights, and colorful comments put her at odds with traditional affordable housing non-profits, local residents, city councils, and developers. But her movement was designed to get attention, and she succeeded in attracting local reporters and big time donors.

While Dougherty does an admirable job noting the privilege of the YIMBY movement, which is predominantly white and often funded with tech money, this is not the main focus of the book. Still, he contrasts SF BARF with an impactful chapter covering advocacy by and for low-income service industry employees, who are often at the greatest risk of displacement. This includes an in-depth story centered on an apartment building that was bought and flipped in a majority Hispanic neighborhood. Through this process, Dougherty describes the actions and perspectives of the developers, the residents who suddenly found themselves faced with $1,000+ increases in monthly rent, the residents’ children, and local activists and charities. This chapter is reminiscent of influential reporting from the turn of the 19th century, such as the work captured in How the Other Half Lives by Jacob Riis, or mid-century activism work, such as The Death and Life of Great American Cities by Jane Jacobs. However, in this ending, the Robert Moseses of the world carry the day.

Dougherty makes clear that the housing shortage, and the displacement, homelessness, and inequity that follows it, calls for a human rights discussion centered on the conscience of the nation. While he discusses solutions such as imposing rent control, reducing building restrictions, changes to the building industry, and increasing multi-family zoning, they do not form the central thesis of the book. Instead, Golden Gates ends on how the housing crisis is, in many ways, about what we are willing to provide for those of us who have the least when it comes at the cost of those with more affluence and power. These moral questions are contrasted with the mismatch of incentives for addressing wide-spanning issues at the local level when the responsibility for the problem is diffused across states, countries, or even the global population. This point is captured by Steve Falk, a city planner for Lafayette, California, who resigned in the face of resident outrage during discussions on increasing density near a BART (light-rail transit) stop: “All cities – even small ones – have a responsibility to address the most significant challenges of our time: climate change, income inequality, and housing affordability” (116).

Golden Gates is on Time’s list of 100 Must-Read Books of 2020, is an Editor’s Choice of the New York Times, and is on Planetizen’s list for Top Urban Planning Books of 2020. These accolades are well deserved. The book is accessible to readers working outside of this subject area, and interesting to those, such as planners, working within it. Even housing scholars will find new insights and unfamiliar stories, while those without such a background will be able to pick it up and find themselves invested in the intricacies of local planning and the friction of the democratic process.

Buy Golden Gates here.

Find Volume 46 of the Carolina Planning Journal online here.


Nora Louise Schwaller is a PhD candidate at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill in the Department of City and Regional Planning, and a registered architect in the state of North Carolina. Her research interests focus on migration, climate change adaptation, and equitable recoveries.

« Older posts