Bridging Theory and Practice Since 1974

Tag: Protest

Greenwashing Alert: Where’s the Three Zeros Plan, UNC?

On September 20, 2019, I participated in the global climate strike at the Peace and Justice Plaza on Franklin Street spurred by Greta Thunberg and her Skolestreik for Klimaet. I was inspired to see Chapel Hill elementary, middle and high school students striking to attend the event, and showing their support for climate action. I was also happy to see local residents, most of whom were older. 

People held clever signs with clear messages; one protester wore a Santa Claus costume with a sign that read “Santa says coal is naughty.” A variety of environmental activism groups like Citizens’ Climate Lobby and Sunrise Movement shared their messages and recruited support. Speakers took to the microphone to share their perspectives. We sang and chanted. It felt great to stand with others in support of climate action. Even so, I left the strike disheartened for two reasons:

  1. I saw so few UNC undergrad students that I could have counted them on my own two hands. Where were the young people that say they care about environmentalism?
  2. The climate strike did not have a clear target audience or clear message. Activism cannot be effective without clear goals, objectives, and strategies.

I left with a desire to cultivate the energy and sense of community that I felt at the September 20 strike at the Peace and Justice Plaza, and to call for specific change in my local sphere, i.e. on campus at UNC.

As a former Three Zeros Environmental Initiative (TZEI) employee, I have unique insight into the reality of the status of UNC’s sustainability initiative. Carol Folt announced the initiative in 2016, identifying three goals: zero waste to landfills, zero greenhouse gas emissions, and net zero water use. As an intern, I watched TZEI quietly abandon its deadline of 2050, hire a consulting firm to develop a comprehensive plan, fire that consulting firm and scrap the deliverable, announce intentions to release a plan on Three Zeros Day in 2018 (the second anniversary of UNC’s adoption of the initiative), and then fail to produce it. No plan materialized for Three Zeros Day in 2019 either. It’s time to hold UNC accountable by demanding the release of a comprehensive, actionable Three Zeros plan. Read my letter to the Chancellor about this issue in the Daily Tar Heel here.

TZEI has promised the release of a comprehensive plan to achieve these goals for three years, but has not delivered. This is in part because of the frequent change in leadership—Carol Folt established this program in 2016, and has since left the University. Chief Sustainability Officer Brad Ives was fired last year, leaving the initiative under the direction of UNC Director of Energy Services Lew Kellogg. Among his other duties as Director of Energy Services, Kellogg oversees UNC’s coal plant – a role in inherent, direct conflict with the goal of zero greenhouse gas emissions.

I made a plan to strike for the climate on the steps of South Building where senior administrators make decisions that directly determine UNC’s environmental impact. I would call for the public release of a comprehensive, actionable Three Zeros Plan that explains in detail how the University will achieve its widely publicized and highly celebrated goals. Our first strike was a success—fellow students and I brought coffee and signs to the steps of the South Building and sat there for almost five hours, talking through what we knew about sustainability at UNC, and what we thought needed to change.

Students Olivia Corriere (left) and Zach Walker (right) strike on the steps of the South Building to pressure the UNC administration to release a Three Zeros Plan.

Since then, students have striked fourteen times on the steps of South Building calling for the release of a comprehensive, actionable Three Zeros Plan. The powerful people that work in this building, which houses the Office of the Chancellor, have to walk by us every Friday and acknowledge that UNC students care about climate action, that we are watching what they do, and that we will hold them accountable. By demonstrating in person, we have slowly built relationships with some administrators, who have been helpful in making suggestions on how to evolve and extend our efforts to impact change. 

At every strike, supporters sign the “guestbook” in support. Over time, supporters have written dozens of messages, like these:

  • “Want to see tangible next steps for climate action” (9/27/19)
  • “Nothing is not an option” (10/4/19)
  • “UNC cares more about money than they do about our planet” (10/4/19)
  • “No more coal!” (10/25/19)
  • “I am the Three Zeros Student Leader 2019. I do not know what I am supposed to be representing at the moment. That is a problem… no plan, no transparency!” (11/1/19)
  • “I am fighting for this University to not be a hypocrisy and prepare the next generation” (11/22/19)
  • “I am fighting for my baby nephew’s future!” (11/22/19)
  • “The students are doing their part…it’s time for the administration to stop hiding behind PR worries” (11/22/19)
  • “New decade, same vibes. I’d like to live; give me back my good, stable climate.” (1/10/20)
  • “UNC-CH should be a leader for other universities in the fight against the climate crisis.” (1/10/20)
  • “We owe this to the future students at UNC” (1/17/20)
  • “Environmental justice is racial justice” (1/24/20)
  • “End coal on college campuses. Be a visionary for once. Have some courage for once.” (1/24/20)
  • “DAMMIT UNC, YOU BETTER STOP PLAYIN’” (1/24/20)
  • “Everyone is listening, waiting… UNC, your move.” (2/14/20)
  • “It’s Valentine’s Day—can’t we PLEASE show our planet some LOVE?!?” (2/14/20)

Sometimes it can be hard to know whether this kind of activism is effective, but I knew we were holding administration’s feet to the fire on this issue when Chancellor Guskiewicz stopped by our strike a couple weeks ago to ask, “how many more of these strikes do you have planned?” to which my response was, “as many as it takes until the Three Zeros Plan is released.”

If you’d like to strike with this movement, find us on the steps of South Building every Friday morning, usually 8:30am-noon. Check out the Facebook page here. If you’d like to do something here and now to support this movement, email the Chancellor (chancellor@unc.edu) and call for the release of a comprehensive Three Zeros Plan!

Featured Image: Students gather on the steps of the South Building for the first Three Zeros strike on September 27, 2019.

About the Author: Olivia Corriere is a senior undergraduate studying environmental sustainability, geography, and urban planning. She serves as Co-Chair of the UNC Renewable Energy Special Projects Committee, managing renewable energy projects on campus. She also works as Project Manager at Blue Dogwood Public Market in Chapel Hill, NC. She plans to work in renewable energy development when she graduates in May. In her free time, Olivia enjoys hiking, running, and cooking with people she loves.

What Charlottesville Tells Us About Silent Sam

On Saturday August 12th, a white nationalist rally protesting the planned removal of a Confederate monument in Charlottesville dissolved into violence that left three dead and many injured. The circumstances that led to this tragedy bear an uncomfortable resemblance to events that took place less than two years ago at UNC, when Confederate heritage supporters rallied to defend Silent Sam. Then, as now, counter-protestors rallied and directly confronted those assembled to defend the monument.

No one was hurt at UNC in 2015, but what happened in Charlottesville shows how close we are to the edge. As much as I fear that our campus could become the next lightning rod of racist and fascist violence, I fear more for the future of our University if we do nothing. Charlottesville only makes the stakes clearer. Our community is actively imperiled by the revisionist history that Silent Sam represents. Silent Sam should be removed from the center of campus because it validates the worldview of the far right and perpetuates racist narratives within our own community.

Silent Sam was a gift to the University of North Carolina from the United Daughters of the Confederacy. Installed in 1913, nearly fifty years after the end of the Civil War, the statue is an example of a ‘lost cause’ monument. Built between 1895 and 1935, these memorials elevate the Confederate soldier as the model of citizenship and frame the conflict as one that ennobled those who participated.[1] Crafted in white society experiencing the upheaval of emancipation, the lost cause narrative reassured Southern whites by supplanting the dishonor of defeat with a romanticized image of a confederacy in which brave young men fought and died against a tyrannical Northern aggressor with superior resources. The narrative frames the tremendous casualties of the war as a sort of martyrdom: a noble sacrifice cleansed from complicity in slavery and upheld as an example of civic virtue.

The placement of a lost cause monument at the center of UNC’s campus is intentional. These monuments were erected in front of courthouses and by busy thoroughfares to purposefully enshrine a positive narrative about the Confederacy within the public life of the South. Formerly in front of the County Courthouse, the Confederate monument pulled down by Durham protestors on August 14th is another example. On UNC’s campus, Silent Sam’s message continues to be heard. You need look no further than The Daily Tar Heel to see the lost cause narrative within our public discourse.

In the fall of 2015, when the Real Silent Sam Coalition and local Black Lives Matter activists called for the statue’s removal, DTH published several letters to the editor in the statue’s defense. One letter, titled ‘Silent Sam Represents Sacrifice, Not Hate,’ describes the monument as “a reminder of the willingness of [Confederate soldiers] to sacrifice their lives for their community, society and families and [sic] their courage, tenacity and fortitude.”[2] Another letter supposes that removing the memorial negates “all who had fought and died in vain and the civilian lives of Southern women that were raped by the Union soldiers that pillaged, stole and burned anything that they could not steal.”[3]

I do not deny the atrocities of the Civil War. The problem lies within the insidious nature of the lost cause narrative, which is a project of historical revisionism cloaked in the disguise of honoring the dead. The lost cause narrative succeeds when it obscures slavery from public memory of the Civil War. It succeeds when it ennobles the Confederate soldier and denies his defense of slavery. Every step we take towards this narrative is a step away from historic fact and further erodes the shared understanding of American history that we need in order to have a conversation about race.

Further, as an imagined student of the University, Silent Sam is a particularly potent symbol, both in the eyes of the white men and women who see the image of their ancestors, and in the eyes of the people of color who see him as their oppressor. Silent Sam embodies the myth of white innocence in the past, as boldly stated in the letters to the editor written in his defense. By the same token, he embodies the myth of white innocence today. The controversy around Silent Sam holds a mirror to the campus community, and we might not be flattered by what we see.

The University’s discomfort around acknowledging white supremacy tacitly legitimizes the support of Confederate monuments. More than the continuance of the lost cause narrative, this is why the University should remove the statue. Carolina’s trend of downplaying and denying the damage of white supremacy in the past and today must end. The stakes are too high—Charlottesville shows us exactly what arises from the spread of these messages.

For a place like the University of North Carolina, living up to the values of diversity and inclusion is going to include difficult and uncomfortable moments. Removing Silent Sam would send a clear message about the University’s commitment to these values. As long as monuments to the lost cause remain on our campus, the lost cause narrative remains in our community. Now, more than ever, we need to populate our sacred ground with monuments that truly speak to our principles.

Feature image photo: 2015 Silent Sam protest. Photo by Brittany Jordan, UNC’s Campus Y.

[1] Thomas J. Brown, interviewed by Frank Stasio, “Flags, Soldier Statues and Civil War Memory,” WUNC, an affiliate of National Public Radio, (12 November 2015), http://wunc.org/post/flags-soldier-statues-and-civil-war-memory#stream/0.

[2] Dr. Edith Bernosky, “Letter: Silent Sam represents sacrifice, not hate,” The Daily Tar Heel, (10 November 2015), http://www.dailytarheel.com/article/2015/11/letter-silent-sam-represents-sacrifice-not-hate.

[3] Danny Knowles, “Letter: Remove all war memorials or none,” The Daily Tar Heel, (24 August 2015), http://www.dailytarheel.com/article/2015/08/letter-remove-all-war-memorials-or-none.

Libbie Weimer completed a master’s in the Department of City and Regional Planning at UNC Chapel Hill with a specialization in Land Use and Environmental Planning in 2016. She is interested in the connections between energy production, water quality, and environmental justice. Weimer currently splits her time between academic research, GIS consulting, and documentary filmmaking.

Planners in Protest

Whether through attending protests, organizing community groups, or coordinating postcard-writing campaigns, the planning students of UNC-Chapel Hill’s Department of City and Regional Planning have refused to stay silent in response to the Trump administration’s attacks on immigrants, people of color, women, and the low-income.

Jason Rece, who is an assistant professor of City and Regional Planning at the Ohio State University, wrote in a post for Planetizen that, in the wake of the election, planners “play a critical role in supporting an integrated society in which all members have access to opportunity and the chance to thrive.” The following photos and reflections, taken and written by DCRP planning students at protests around the country, demonstrate how we have and will continue to stand up for equality.

karla1

Photo credit: Karla Jimenez, MCRP/MPH ’19

karla2

Photo credit: Karla Jimenez, MCRP/MPH ’19

“One of the many amazing things about the Women’s March on Washington was seeing how naturally people took to the streets throughout the city, even chanting ‘Whose streets? Our streets!’ It was incredible to see how powerful we were, simply by taking up space with our bodies in a place normally reserved for cars. Even though I spend a lot of time thinking about how pedestrians can have more rights in our streets, that day really brought home to me what we can accomplish face to face, out of vehicles that can often dehumanize, disconnect, and disempower us.” – Katy Lang, MCRP ’18

 

katylang

Protestors from the Women’s March on Washington, DC walk up 14th St. NW, more than two miles from the original protest meeting point (January 21, 2017). Photo credit: Katy Lang

 

img_2187

The Women’s March on Raleigh. Photo credit: Carly Hoffmann, MCRP ’18

“Our government leaders must understand their actions and policies need to serve the over 300,000,000 individuals they claim to represent!” – Shamsa Mangalji, MCRP ’17

protest1

Shamsa Mangalji, MCRP ’17 (bottom row, second from left), at the Women’s March on Washington. Photo credit: Shamsa Mangalji

16231059_10154597943157415_1012795329_o

The Women’s March on Raleigh. Photo credit: Christian Kamrath, MCRP ’18

fb_img_1485891516030

Lilah Besser (center), a PhD candidate in DCRP, at the Seattle Women’s March with her son and mother. Photo credit: Lilah Besser.

 

About the Author: Carly Hoffmann is a co-editor of the Carolina Planning Journal and a first year master’s student in the Department of City and Regional Planning, focusing on housing and community development. Prior to UNC, she worked as a book editor for Amazon.com. Carly graduated from Columbia University in 2010 with a degree in Urban Studies.