Bridging Theory and Practice Since 1974

Tag: UNC Campus

Undergrads analyze UNC spaces

This post was originally published on February 28, 2018. As the end of summer approaches and the school year starts, we go back to one of the archives to take a look at the spaces at UNC.

By Marques Wilson, Forest Schweitzer, Olivia Corriere, Bronwyn Bishop, and Joe Young

As part of the Community Design and Green Architecture (ENEC 420) course with Eric Thomas, the Project Manager and Lead Designer at Development Finance Initiative, undergraduate UNC students evaluated public space. Using video and behavior mapping techniques, students evaluated how different local spaces are used, or not, at different times of the day and on different days. They noted weather and other factors that would influence the behavior of people in the space, and produced final reports and videos to highlight the design features that seem successful in attracting and keeping people, and those that fall short. See excerpts from two groups’ final reports and their videos below:

The Pit: 

 

“There is nothing elegant, advanced or expertly designed about The Pit at UNC and yet it is a focal point of our campus. It is quite literally a glorified rectangle-shaped hole in the ground. It’s only definitive feature being steps lining the edge and two large trees in it’s center. How does something so simple have such an impact on the everyday lives of students? The Pit’s simplistic nature lends itself to ease of use, but it is largely so successful because of its central location. The Pit is surrounded by some of the most frequently visited buildings on campus: the student union, the Student Store, the dining hall, Lenoir, The Undergraduate Library, and Davis Library. These buildings attract students of all years and majors.

The Pit is used in many ways and is a healthy, bustling part of UNC’s campus. However, it could stand to be improved. For example, the entire unused section nearest to the Undergraduate Library could be revitalized using creative seating solutions. We propose a designed space — different than anything The Pit has seen before — of modern multi-use benches in what is now “dead space.” An example of our vision is the Plaza at Harvard and the simplistic, yet artistic benches that exist there. Our hope is that this will give new life to this area of The Pit because when people see intentional seating for them in a popular social place, they will utilize it. Also, the modern design of the benches will give The Pit and exciting element of relevance in design that college students are likely to be interested in.”

Sculpture Garden:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d0wshgas3Ak&t=5s

“We chose to analyze the Sculpture Garden, which lays between Kenan College of Music, the Hanes Art Center, and Swain Hall.  The space is primarily transitional, with bits of student-made art sprinkled throughout.  A diagonal, bricked walkway extends through a grass matrix, forming a square with three sides touching the above buildings. The Sculpture Garden is a moderate-to-heavily used space.  The primary form of traffic is individuals walking in either direction along the prescribed brick pathway.  Although there were bikes present in the data, the absence of bike infrastructure, and the sometimes clogged nature of the pathway deterred most from riding their bikes through the Garden.  One might think that the grass matrix would be attractive sprawling space for individuals and groups looking to eddy out of the central flow, or to simply mill about and consume the art present, but this data was absent from the study.  Some few individuals crossed ‘unconventionally’ across the grass, but these were in the extreme minority.  The particularity of the pathway (leading to the front doors of Hanes Art) does not lead for much variation, and thus only suits a specific type of traveler: they who wish to walk from Swain Hall, or other locals in mid campus, to Hanes Art or over to South Columbia Street.

Our recommendations would be to make the space feel like it belongs in the arts part of campus.  Make it different.  Make it new.  The single brick path should either be removed or downplayed.  A program should be put in place informing passers-by that they are free to walk in the way most organic to them, for perhaps a year.  At the end of this period, the paths naturally worn into the grass matrix could be either bricked over or simply defined and formalized.  More sculptures and places for people to sit should be installed.  The sculptures fortify the space; they make a large, empty space feel small and intimate.  They afford privacy without actually cutting the individual off from the rest of the Garden.  Even non-three dimensional additions like posters and murals on the sides of Kenan and Hanes would really bring the place alive.  There is ample real estate with which to flesh out not only the Sculpture Garden, but to crystalize what it means to be an artist at Carolina.  In doing so the university could strengthen its image, and foster a robust space for artists on campus to share their own work and consume and comment on the work of their peers and mentors.”

Analysis of the Sculpture Garden by Marques Wilson (Undergraduate Senior, Public Relations B.A., Sustainability Minor), Forest Schweitzer (Undergraduate Junior, Environmental Studies B.A. – Sustainability Track), and Olivia Corriere (Undergraduate Sophomore, Environmental Studies B.A. – Sustainability Track, Geography Minor).

Analysis of the Pit by Bronwyn Bishop (Undergraduate Senior, Environmental Studies B.A. – Sustainability Track, Writing for the Screen and Stage Minor) and Joe Young (Senior, Environmental Science B.S., Mathematics Minor).

Featured Image: The Pit at UNC Chapel Hill. Photo Credit: UNC Admissions

Greenwashing Alert: Where’s the Three Zeros Plan, UNC?

On September 20, 2019, I participated in the global climate strike at the Peace and Justice Plaza on Franklin Street spurred by Greta Thunberg and her Skolestreik for Klimaet. I was inspired to see Chapel Hill elementary, middle and high school students striking to attend the event, and showing their support for climate action. I was also happy to see local residents, most of whom were older. 

People held clever signs with clear messages; one protester wore a Santa Claus costume with a sign that read “Santa says coal is naughty.” A variety of environmental activism groups like Citizens’ Climate Lobby and Sunrise Movement shared their messages and recruited support. Speakers took to the microphone to share their perspectives. We sang and chanted. It felt great to stand with others in support of climate action. Even so, I left the strike disheartened for two reasons:

  1. I saw so few UNC undergrad students that I could have counted them on my own two hands. Where were the young people that say they care about environmentalism?
  2. The climate strike did not have a clear target audience or clear message. Activism cannot be effective without clear goals, objectives, and strategies.

I left with a desire to cultivate the energy and sense of community that I felt at the September 20 strike at the Peace and Justice Plaza, and to call for specific change in my local sphere, i.e. on campus at UNC.

As a former Three Zeros Environmental Initiative (TZEI) employee, I have unique insight into the reality of the status of UNC’s sustainability initiative. Carol Folt announced the initiative in 2016, identifying three goals: zero waste to landfills, zero greenhouse gas emissions, and net zero water use. As an intern, I watched TZEI quietly abandon its deadline of 2050, hire a consulting firm to develop a comprehensive plan, fire that consulting firm and scrap the deliverable, announce intentions to release a plan on Three Zeros Day in 2018 (the second anniversary of UNC’s adoption of the initiative), and then fail to produce it. No plan materialized for Three Zeros Day in 2019 either. It’s time to hold UNC accountable by demanding the release of a comprehensive, actionable Three Zeros plan. Read my letter to the Chancellor about this issue in the Daily Tar Heel here.

TZEI has promised the release of a comprehensive plan to achieve these goals for three years, but has not delivered. This is in part because of the frequent change in leadership—Carol Folt established this program in 2016, and has since left the University. Chief Sustainability Officer Brad Ives was fired last year, leaving the initiative under the direction of UNC Director of Energy Services Lew Kellogg. Among his other duties as Director of Energy Services, Kellogg oversees UNC’s coal plant – a role in inherent, direct conflict with the goal of zero greenhouse gas emissions.

I made a plan to strike for the climate on the steps of South Building where senior administrators make decisions that directly determine UNC’s environmental impact. I would call for the public release of a comprehensive, actionable Three Zeros Plan that explains in detail how the University will achieve its widely publicized and highly celebrated goals. Our first strike was a success—fellow students and I brought coffee and signs to the steps of the South Building and sat there for almost five hours, talking through what we knew about sustainability at UNC, and what we thought needed to change.

Students Olivia Corriere (left) and Zach Walker (right) strike on the steps of the South Building to pressure the UNC administration to release a Three Zeros Plan.

Since then, students have striked fourteen times on the steps of South Building calling for the release of a comprehensive, actionable Three Zeros Plan. The powerful people that work in this building, which houses the Office of the Chancellor, have to walk by us every Friday and acknowledge that UNC students care about climate action, that we are watching what they do, and that we will hold them accountable. By demonstrating in person, we have slowly built relationships with some administrators, who have been helpful in making suggestions on how to evolve and extend our efforts to impact change. 

At every strike, supporters sign the “guestbook” in support. Over time, supporters have written dozens of messages, like these:

  • “Want to see tangible next steps for climate action” (9/27/19)
  • “Nothing is not an option” (10/4/19)
  • “UNC cares more about money than they do about our planet” (10/4/19)
  • “No more coal!” (10/25/19)
  • “I am the Three Zeros Student Leader 2019. I do not know what I am supposed to be representing at the moment. That is a problem… no plan, no transparency!” (11/1/19)
  • “I am fighting for this University to not be a hypocrisy and prepare the next generation” (11/22/19)
  • “I am fighting for my baby nephew’s future!” (11/22/19)
  • “The students are doing their part…it’s time for the administration to stop hiding behind PR worries” (11/22/19)
  • “New decade, same vibes. I’d like to live; give me back my good, stable climate.” (1/10/20)
  • “UNC-CH should be a leader for other universities in the fight against the climate crisis.” (1/10/20)
  • “We owe this to the future students at UNC” (1/17/20)
  • “Environmental justice is racial justice” (1/24/20)
  • “End coal on college campuses. Be a visionary for once. Have some courage for once.” (1/24/20)
  • “DAMMIT UNC, YOU BETTER STOP PLAYIN’” (1/24/20)
  • “Everyone is listening, waiting… UNC, your move.” (2/14/20)
  • “It’s Valentine’s Day—can’t we PLEASE show our planet some LOVE?!?” (2/14/20)

Sometimes it can be hard to know whether this kind of activism is effective, but I knew we were holding administration’s feet to the fire on this issue when Chancellor Guskiewicz stopped by our strike a couple weeks ago to ask, “how many more of these strikes do you have planned?” to which my response was, “as many as it takes until the Three Zeros Plan is released.”

If you’d like to strike with this movement, find us on the steps of South Building every Friday morning, usually 8:30am-noon. Check out the Facebook page here. If you’d like to do something here and now to support this movement, email the Chancellor (chancellor@unc.edu) and call for the release of a comprehensive Three Zeros Plan!

Featured Image: Students gather on the steps of the South Building for the first Three Zeros strike on September 27, 2019.

About the Author: Olivia Corriere is a senior undergraduate studying environmental sustainability, geography, and urban planning. She serves as Co-Chair of the UNC Renewable Energy Special Projects Committee, managing renewable energy projects on campus. She also works as Project Manager at Blue Dogwood Public Market in Chapel Hill, NC. She plans to work in renewable energy development when she graduates in May. In her free time, Olivia enjoys hiking, running, and cooking with people she loves.

Undergrads analyze UNC spaces

As part of the Community Design and Green Architecture (ENEC 420) course with Eric Thomas, the Project Manager and Lead Designer at Development Finance Initiative, undergraduate UNC students evaluated public space. Using video and behavior mapping techniques, students evaluated how different local spaces are used, or not, at different times of the day and on different days. They noted weather and other factors that would influence the behavior of people in the space, and produced final reports and videos to highlight the design features that seem successful in attracting and keeping people, and those that fall short. See excerpts from two groups’ final reports and their videos below.

The Pit: 

“There is nothing elegant, advanced or expertly designed about The Pit at UNC and yet it is a focal point of our campus. It is quite literally a glorified rectangle-shaped hole in the ground. It’s only definitive feature being steps lining the edge and two large trees in it’s center. How does something so simple have such an impact on the everyday lives of students? The Pit’s simplistic nature lends itself to ease of use, but it is largely so successful because of its central location. The Pit is surrounded by some of the most frequently visited buildings on campus: the student union, the Student Store, the dining hall, Lenoir, The Undergraduate Library, and Davis Library. These buildings attract students of all years and majors.

The Pit is used in many ways and is a healthy, bustling part of UNC’s campus. However, it could stand to be improved. For example, the entire unused section nearest to the Undergraduate Library could be revitalized using creative seating solutions. We propose a designed space — different than anything The Pit has seen before — of modern multi-use benches in what is now “dead space.” An example of our vision is the Plaza at Harvard and the simplistic, yet artistic benches that exist there. Our hope is that this will give new life to this area of The Pit because when people see intentional seating for them in a popular social place, they will utilize it. Also, the modern design of the benches will give The Pit and exciting element of relevance in design that college students are likely to be interested in.”

Sculpture Garden:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d0wshgas3Ak&t=5s

“We chose to analyze the Sculpture Garden, which lays between Kenan College of Music, the Hanes Art Center, and Swain Hall.  The space is primarily transitional, with bits of student-made art sprinkled throughout.  A diagonal, bricked walkway extends through a grass matrix, forming a square with three sides touching the above buildings. The Sculpture Garden is a moderate-to-heavily used space.  The primary form of traffic is individuals walking in either direction along the prescribed brick pathway.  Although there were bikes present in the data, the absence of bike infrastructure, and the sometimes clogged nature of the pathway deterred most from riding their bikes through the Garden.  One might think that the grass matrix would be attractive sprawling space for individuals and groups looking to eddy out of the central flow, or to simply mill about and consume the art present, but this data was absent from the study.  Some few individuals crossed ‘unconventionally’ across the grass, but these were in the extreme minority.  The particularity of the pathway (leading to the front doors of Hanes Art) does not lead for much variation, and thus only suits a specific type of traveler: they who wish to walk from Swain Hall, or other locals in mid campus, to Hanes Art or over to South Columbia Street.

Our recommendations would be to make the space feel like it belongs in the arts part of campus.  Make it different.  Make it new.  The single brick path should either be removed or downplayed.  A program should be put in place informing passers-by that they are free to walk in the way most organic to them, for perhaps a year.  At the end of this period, the paths naturally worn into the grass matrix could be either bricked over or simply defined and formalized.  More sculptures and places for people to sit should be installed.  The sculptures fortify the space; they make a large, empty space feel small and intimate.  They afford privacy without actually cutting the individual off from the rest of the Garden.  Even non-three dimensional additions like posters and murals on the sides of Kenan and Hanes would really bring the place alive.  There is ample real estate with which to flesh out not only the Sculpture Garden, but to crystalize what it means to be an artist at Carolina.  In doing so the university could strengthen its image, and foster a robust space for artists on campus to share their own work and consume and comment on the work of their peers and mentors.”

 

Analysis of the Sculpture Garden by Marques Wilson (Undergraduate Senior, Public Relations B.A., Sustainability Minor), Forest Schweitzer (Undergraduate Junior, Environmental Studies B.A. – Sustainability Track), and Olivia Corriere (Undergraduate Sophomore, Environmental Studies B.A. – Sustainability Track, Geography Minor).

Analysis of the Pit by Bronwyn Bishop (Undergraduate Senior, Environmental Studies B.A. – Sustainability Track, Writing for the Screen and Stage Minor) and Joe Young (Senior, Environmental Science B.S., Mathematics Minor).

Featured Image: The Pit at UNC Chapel Hill. Photo Credit: UNC Admissions